Skip to guide
Product LiabilityLawsuit Guide

Class action vs. mass tort: which kind of case fits your injury?

How class actions, MDL mass torts and individual lawsuits differ, with current product cases as examples.

Reviewed on

Start with the brief answerQuestions, answered plainly

TL;DR

A class action is one lawsuit brought by a few people for a whole group, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. A mass tort keeps each person's case separate but groups them in one federal court for pretrial work, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. An individual lawsuit is one person's own case. Injury claims that vary widely usually proceed as mass torts or individual suits.

  • Class action: a few representatives sue for everyone in the class. A class settlement needs a judge to find it fair, reasonable and adequate.
  • Mass tort (MDL): each person keeps their own claim and must prove their own damages. Cases share one judge for pretrial work, then can go back to their home courts.
  • Individual lawsuit: one person's case in one court. Pressure cooker injury cases proceed this way, with no MDL.
  • Roundup has both: a federal MDL with 1,104 pending cases and a proposed $7.25 billion class settlement in Missouri state court, as of October 2026.
  • The hair relaxer MDL had 12,381 pending cases as of Oct. 1, 2026, the fourth-largest pending MDL.

How the two differ, in brief

There are three main ways a product injury case can move through the courts.

  • A class action is one case. A few people, called class representatives, sue on behalf of everyone in a defined group.
  • A mass tort is many separate cases handled together. In federal court, this usually happens through multidistrict litigation, or an MDL.
  • An individual lawsuit is one person’s own case, in one court, on its own schedule.

Injury claims often vary from person to person. That is why most physical injury claims proceed as mass torts or individual suits, not class actions. Your lawyer decides which path fits your case. This page is general information, not legal advice.

Side-by-side comparison

Class action Mass tort (MDL) Individual lawsuit
Legal basis (federal) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Ordinary state or federal suit
How many cases One case for the whole class Many separate cases in one court One case
Who leads Class representatives and class counsel Court-appointed leadership, plus each person’s lawyer Your lawyer
Must you prove your own damages? No; the case proceeds as one representative case Yes Yes
How it ends A settlement needs court approval as “fair, reasonable, and adequate” Individual or group settlements, or trials after cases return home Settlement, trial or dismissal
Typical fit Many people with similar losses, such as economic loss Physical injuries that vary too much for a class A single injury, or product types with no MDL
Current product example Proposed Roundup class settlement (Missouri state court) Hair relaxer MDL 3060 Pressure cooker injury suits

Class actions under Rule 23

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 sets the rules for class actions in federal court. Under Rule 23(a), representatives may sue for a class only if four things are true:

  1. The class is so large that joining everyone in one suit is impractical.
  2. The class shares common questions of law or fact.
  3. The claims of the representatives match those of the class as a whole.
  4. The representatives will fairly and adequately protect the class.

A class case can settle only with court approval. Under Rule 23(e), the judge must find the deal “fair, reasonable, and adequate.”

Class actions often fit claims where everyone lost something similar, such as money. In the Chapman v. Tristar case, a nationwide class settlement covered pressure cooker buyers. Critics valued it at about $1 million to consumers, mostly in coupons and warranty extensions, against about $2 million in class counsel fees. The Sixth Circuit rejected Arizona’s bid to void it.

Example: the Roundup class settlement

The Roundup litigation shows how a class settlement works for injury claims. As of October 2026:

  • The deal. On Feb. 17, 2026, Monsanto filed a proposed nationwide class settlement of up to $7.25 billion in St. Louis. It pays capped annual amounts over up to 21 years.
  • Who is covered. People exposed before mid-February 2026 who are diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma now or within 16 years of approval.
  • Opt-outs. June 4, 2026 was the last day to opt out or object. If opt-outs pass a set level, Bayer may walk away from the deal.
  • Court review. Judge Timothy Boyer granted preliminary approval on March 4, 2026. A federal judge sent the case back to state court in June 2026 after objectors tried to move it. The fairness hearing was held on Sept. 14, 2026. No final ruling had been reported as of mid-October 2026.
  • Concerns. In May 2026, federal MDL Judge Vince Chhabria questioned whether the deal can bind out-of-state users and people not yet diagnosed. He declined to block it.

The settlement runs alongside the federal Roundup MDL (MDL 2741), which had 1,104 pending cases as of Oct. 1, 2026. People outside the class can still bring their own cases. A St. Louis trial on design-defect theories, brought by three women outside the class, began on Sept. 29, 2026.

The Supreme Court’s June 2026 Durnell decision also matters. It held that federal pesticide law preempts state failure-to-warn claims that would require a cancer warning on the Roundup label. It did not address other theories, such as design defect.

Mass torts and MDLs under 28 U.S.C. § 1407

A mass tort is a large group of injury cases against the same company over the same product. Each person keeps an individual claim and must prove their own damages.

In federal court, these cases are often combined through an MDL. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, cases with common questions of fact pending in different districts can be transferred to one court. That court handles pretrial work for all of them, such as discovery and rulings on the science. Each case is then sent back to its home district at or before the end of pretrial proceedings.

Court-appointed leadership lawyers handle shared tasks. Your own lawyer still handles your claim.

Example: the hair relaxer MDL

The hair relaxer litigation is the fourth-largest pending MDL in federal court.

Fact Detail
Case name In re Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, MDL 3060
Court and judge U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Judge Mary M. Rowland
Formed February 2023
Pending cases 12,381 as of Oct. 1, 2026 (fourth-largest pending MDL)
First bellwether trial Set for Sept. 7, 2027, according to a docket tracker
Settlement No global settlement announced as of October 2026

Bellwether trials are early test cases. Their results help both sides judge what other cases may be worth.

Individual lawsuits

Some products never get an MDL or a class action. Each injured person files their own case.

Pressure cookers are an example. No MDL or nationwide class action exists for pressure cooker injuries. A Law Street Media study counted 292 federal pressure cooker suits filed from 2019 to January 2024. Of the cases that had ended, most (133) settled out of court.

An individual case moves on its own schedule, built around your facts.

Which one applies to you?

You usually do not pick the type of case on your own. It depends on the product, the kind of harm, and what other cases already exist.

  1. Physical injury from a product with an MDL: your lawyer will likely file a case that joins the MDL.
  2. A class settlement that covers you: read the notice and ask a lawyer before the opt-out deadline passes.
  3. A product with no group case: your lawyer files an individual lawsuit.

Deadlines still apply in every type of case. See product liability deadlines, and talk to a lawyer about your state’s deadline. For what claims can be worth, see product liability settlements. For the basics, start with the product liability guide.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Your questions, answered step by step

What is the main difference between a class action and a mass tort?

In a class action, the court treats the group as one case led by representatives. In a mass tort, each person keeps an individual claim and must prove their own damages. Mass torts are common when physical injuries vary too much for a class action.

Is an MDL the same as a class action?

No. An MDL groups separate federal cases with common questions of fact in one court for pretrial work. Each case stays its own lawsuit and can be sent back to its home court when pretrial work ends. A class action is a single representative case.

Can I opt out of a class action settlement?

Many class settlements let members opt out by a set date. The proposed Roundup class settlement set June 4, 2026 as its opt-out and objection deadline. People outside a class can bring their own cases; a St. Louis Roundup trial that began in September 2026 involves three women who are outside the class.

Which type of case pays more?

There is no fixed answer. A mass tort or individual case can reflect your own injuries more closely. A class settlement can reach many people at once but often pays by formula. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Do I need my own lawyer if there is already an MDL?

Yes, in most cases. An MDL is made up of individual lawsuits, so each person files a case and needs counsel. Court-appointed leadership lawyers run shared tasks, but your own lawyer handles your claim.

Fact sources

  1. Cornell Law School LII: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, Class actions
  2. Cornell Law School LII: 28 U.S.C. § 1407, Multidistrict litigation
  3. Morgan & Morgan: How do mass torts differ from class actions? (accessed Oct. 2026)
  4. JPML: MDL dockets ranked by number of pending actions (Oct. 1, 2026)
  5. Fox Business: Bayer proposes $7.25B plan to settle Roundup cancer lawsuits (Feb. 2026)
  6. Claims Journal: Judge grants preliminary approval to Roundup settlement (March 5, 2026)
  7. The Missouri Times: Federal judge returns proposed Roundup settlement to state court (June 2026)
  8. Lawsuit Information Center: Roundup lawsuit update (plaintiff-firm tracker, Oct. 2026)
  9. Verus: Judge appoints MDL 3060 leadership team for hair products litigation (March 2023)
  10. MDL Update: MDL 3060 hair relaxer docket tracker (third-party, Sept. 2026)
  11. Law Street Media analysis: Under pressure, inside a growing litigation trend (Jan. 30, 2024)
  12. Arizona Capitol Times: Appellate court rejects Arizona's bid to void pressure cooker settlement (Oct. 14, 2019)
  13. Dechert: Supreme Court rules FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims (June 2026)